<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Range Blog &#187; Brand Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therangeblog.com/performance-marketing/brand-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therangeblog.com</link>
	<description>Search Marketing in Our Words</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:42:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Don Draper Has Everything on Me</title>
		<link>http://therangeblog.com/performance-marketing/don-draper-has-everything-on-me/</link>
		<comments>http://therangeblog.com/performance-marketing/don-draper-has-everything-on-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Price Glomski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bourbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigarettes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison shopping revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct opportunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don draper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecommerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expectations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mad men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[madmen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing speak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance marketers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue goals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wow factor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therangeblog.com/?p=1019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let’s clarify, I am not Don Draper.  But if I was, I would be on my 3rd bourbon, 6th cigarette and 100th good idea.  Can performance marketing be cool? Why is it that most performance marketers get pigeon holed into a specific type of strategy? Heck, it’s understood that we will grow your search programs.  There is no question we will knock the pants off last month’s comparison shopping revenue totals.  Yes, we expect to see growth in your dynamic remessaging program this holiday due to results in customer formation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Don Draper Has <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Nothing</span> <em>Everything</em> on Me</strong></p>
<p>Let’s clarify, I am not Don Draper. But if I was, I would be on my 3<sup>rd</sup> bourbon, 6<sup>th</sup> cigarette and 100<sup>th</sup> good idea. Can performance marketing be cool? Why is it that most performance marketers get pigeon holed into a specific type of strategy? Heck, it’s understood that we will grow your search programs. There is no question we will knock the pants off last month’s comparison shopping revenue totals. Yes, we expect to see growth in your dynamic remessaging program this holiday due to results in customer formation.</p>
<p>This being said, why do our branding/creative counterparts get to partake in a more liberal metric orientation? As a performance marketer, we have the unique ability to quantify and qualify brand experience. Why don’t we get any brand love? There are a few barriers to entry, although slowly but surely… more performance marketers are making the brand case.</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Direct Response vs. Direct Opportunity</strong><br />
Hey, we hit the ceiling in brand search. We can’t find any room to grow our CSE program and our email strategy is functioning at the highest open rate in the last few years. Where can we scale the program? Your DR programs feed off solid brand strategy. Look for direct opportunity, which I consider to be anything outside of our comfort zone. In a stagnant economy, partners tend to be on the flexible side. Do we have the ability to back into a CPC? Will they guarantee impression volume based on conversion metrics? Is rev share out of the question?</li>
<li><strong>Appropriate Expectations</strong><br />
“You crashed and burned Mav” – Believe me selling a branding buy like a performance placement doesn’t click. Most advertisers have separate P&amp;L for ecommerce and brand initiative. This typically means that you are also talking to two separate parties, which then means two different marketing speaks. Work with your branding counterparts on stylization. Create a <strong><em>wow</em></strong> factor with supporting performance metrics (i.e. reach and frequency + realistic demand, latency estimates, conversion results and interaction to revenue goals). Make sure that your goals are quantifiably “liberal”.</li>
<li><strong>Management Comfort</strong><br />
We are crushing their numbers. Why throw a wrench in what we know best? These strategies will not take the place of your foundation. Go ahead and keep Google’s lights on, but also think about incremental opportunity. What branding placements have intrigued you? What type of metric do these partners focus on during RFP? What branding worked in the past and what type of metrics where reported? How can you apply the same metrics plus your standard performance outlook (i.e. conversion, AOV, demand and revenue per impression)?</li>
<li><strong>Piece of the Pie</strong><br />
Marketers, particularly agencies, love to share budget. Psych! This is hard point to grasp, but performance and branding agency cross-over can be efficient. Learn from each other. Consolidated strategy tends to optimize consumer interaction, thus increasing the likelihood of program success. In the end, it helps to scale business for the client and their partners.</li>
</ol>
<p>Don Draper, I dedicate the above to you. Let me know if you have any questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://therangeblog.com/performance-marketing/don-draper-has-everything-on-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paint or Potato Chips?</title>
		<link>http://therangeblog.com/ppc/paint-or-potato-chips/</link>
		<comments>http://therangeblog.com/ppc/paint-or-potato-chips/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Freemore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broad match]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversion rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exact match]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negative match]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paint chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search query reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therangeblog.com/?p=434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do a search for “eating paint chips” and take a look at how many paid search ads come up. There’s an ad for Healthy All-Natural chips, which you might want to consider if you really are interested in eating Kelly-Moore Latex Sour Cream and Onions. There are also a number of well known paint companies that are advertising and hopefully not intending for their brand of paint to be used as a snack. And who knows--there may come a day when paint is flavored and non-toxic. Glue is ok to eat now, right? Anyway, you get the idea. It took me a whole minute to find an example of this, and believe me, there were plenty more that were way worse. Now, ask yourself a few questions. What does this do to my search performance and what does it do to my brand image?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do a search for “eating paint chips” and take a look at how many paid search ads come up. There’s an ad for Healthy All-Natural chips, which you might want to consider if you really are interested in eating Kelly-Moore Latex Sour Cream and Onions. There are also a number of well known paint companies that are advertising and hopefully not intending for their brand of paint to be used as a snack. And who knows&#8211;there may come a day when paint is flavored and non-toxic. Glue is ok to eat now, right? Anyway, you get the idea. It took me a whole minute to find an example of this, and believe me, there were plenty more that were way worse. Now, ask yourself a few questions. What does this do to my search performance and what does it do to my brand image?</p>
<p>As brand owners, we wouldn’t think about putting our brand alongside something with a negative connotation, but in PPC, it happens every day. In fact, you could argue that it’s impossible to avoid completely. However, paid search mismatches can be greatly reduced with a few basic strategies every agency should be implementing.</p>
<p><strong>Broad Match and Search Query Reports:</strong></p>
<p>What broad match means for those of you who are unfamiliar with the lingo is that your search query will match to “similar phrases and relevant variations”. For example bidding on “chips” on broad match will allow you to show up for terms such as“Paint chips”, “potato chips”, “poker chips” and “chips TV series”. Extended broad match in Google will further allow you to show up for things like “Erik Estrada”. As you can see it can be very dangerous to bid solely on broad match, especially without an extensive list of negatives and other match types to support it.</p>
<p><strong>Solution:</strong> Google gives you the ability to run Search Query Reports which show you the exact queries you are matching to. If we pulled one for a paint brand, we would see things like “eating” in the search query report and know we needed to add it as a negative keyword. Think of a negative keyword as the opposite of a keyword. It’s something you don’t want to show up for, like a C-SPAN fan club meeting or a really awkward party. Negative broad matching of the word “eating” would ensure that you won’t show up for any search query that contains the word “eating.”</p>
<p>Utilize exact match once you have narrowed the keywords you want to show up for. Exact matching will allow you to show for EXACTLY what the search query type in is. So, if you want to show up for “Paint Chips” you will not show up for anything that contains other search variations such as “eating paint chips”. This will not only make sure you are targeting your creative correctly, but it will also often result in a lower CPC and a higher conversion rate. Obviously, people searching for “eating paint chips” are either looking up movie quotes from Tommy Boy or the phone number for the poison control center.</p>
<p><strong>Brand Image:</strong></p>
<p>While it’s costly to inadvertently appear for terms you don’t want to be associated with, there are farther-reaching implications. When someone is searching for “eating paint chips” and your handcrafted kettle chip brand appears, what do you think that consumers are going to think or associate with your brand?</p>
<p>If you work with an agency ask them about this. If you don’t, make sure this is part of your strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://therangeblog.com/ppc/paint-or-potato-chips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Luxury Digitally Defined</title>
		<link>http://therangeblog.com/performance-marketing/luxury-digitally-defined/</link>
		<comments>http://therangeblog.com/performance-marketing/luxury-digitally-defined/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand presence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[luxury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[luxury brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[luxury retailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[major networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-brand presence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic listings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid search campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therangeblog.com/?p=420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Luxury retailers/brands should cater their major initiatives to ‘refinement of living, indulgence, enjoyments of comforts and pleasures’. As such, shouldn’t the online experience be as comforting and pleasurable as the product itself? Doesn’t it make sense that a buying a luxury brand’s product should be easier and more enjoyable than a buying a discount product from a mass retailer or discounter? So why is it so difficult to even find the luxury official website?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dictionary.com defines luxury as…” a material object, service, etc. conducive to sumptuous living, usually a delicacy, elegance, or refinement of living rather than a necessity” and “free or habitual indulgence in or enjoyment of comforts and pleasures in addition to those necessary for a reasonable standard of well-being.”</p>
<p>This tells me that luxury retailers/brands should cater their major initiatives to ‘refinement of living, indulgence, enjoyments of comforts and pleasures’. As such, shouldn’t the online experience be as comforting and pleasurable as the product itself? Doesn’t it make sense that a buying a luxury brand’s product should be easier and more enjoyable than a buying a discount product from a mass retailer or discounter? So why is it so difficult to even find the luxury official website? Most of the time, I never see an ad where I frequent online and I rarely see search listings (paid or natural) when searching for products (or sometimes even the trademark name) in the search engines. And when I finally find the site, I still have to navigate through flash, wait for video to load, experience a confusing site search and endure a clunky process just to order something. That is not a luxurious experience; it’s a trip to the DMV.</p>
<p>Luxury retailers are highly protective of their brand. Why not treat their customers with similar diligence and care? If your luxury brand’s purchase process has more in common with a trip to municipal court than Monaco, you might want to try the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>If you’re going to have beautiful images through flash/video ads to remind me of the brand and show me the beautiful new products, have them where I spend time online. Better yet, make them clickable right to the product I want to buy, or at least interactive so I can hover /explore, then go to the site when I’m ready to purchase.
<ul>
<li><strong>STRATEGY:</strong> Have a strong presence on major networks. Use re-targeting and behavioral targeting to reach your customers/potential customers. Creative test/use multiple messages to ensure your audience is getting the ad units they like best.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>You’re present in the engines, so be there like you mean it. When I’m looking for a product like yours, make it easy on me to find you. When I’m looking for you by searching for your brand name…be there. Every time.
<ul>
<li><strong>STRATEGY:</strong> Have a strong presence, both from a brand and non-brand presence, both from a paid listing and natural/organic standpoint. Make the creative and meta-description clear by telling me who you are and why your brand is special.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li> When I finally end up on your site, make it easy on me to purchase. Let me see the beautiful, large images of the products I am interested in, show me descriptive words to describe the product, and when I’m ready to buy, let me be able to do that quickly and painlessly. Better yet, thank me for doing so and make me want to come back again and again.
<ul>
<li><strong>STRATEGY:</strong> Use large multiple images. Use descriptive and detailed copy. Remember me if I’ve registered with your site before so I don’t have to re-enter all my personal information. Test! Use conversion optimization tools to target and refine the most customer friendly purchase paths and website organization.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>I think it’s very fair to say that most luxury retailers and luxury brands do a tremendous job of making beautiful and luxurious products. It’s the basis in which all their efforts are based. Catalogs and image ads are gorgeous and classy, and so is the typical in-store experience. So why is it that luxury retailers are usually the last to make the online experience as luxurious and comforting as possible? Why is it the mass discounters and retailers of the world are the ones that make the online shopping experience comfortable and convenient? Online works amazingly well for most advertisers, and it’s trackable. That’s no secret. Focus on making that entire online channel as luxurious and comforting as that handbag or skin cream your customer loves you for, and you’ll have me coming back again and again. Or at least on payday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://therangeblog.com/performance-marketing/luxury-digitally-defined/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does It Make Sense To Run Branded Paid Search?</title>
		<link>http://therangeblog.com/ppc/does-it-make-sense-to-run-branded-paid-search/</link>
		<comments>http://therangeblog.com/ppc/does-it-make-sense-to-run-branded-paid-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 00:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff LeVan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonbrand Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branded search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversion window]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incremental revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-brand search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid search roi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therangeblog.com/?p=368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does it make sense to run branded paid search? If you run branded search are you just taking credit for conversions that would have happened anyway? Is running just non-brand the way to go because it drives purely incremental revenue? Even if it kills your paid search ROI, these are valid questions to consider. It’s important to think about how paid search impacts a client’s business as a whole, not just boast about glitzy 50-to-1 ROI numbers from just running brand. These are the issues that we tried to consider when devising a test to determine whether or not it makes sense for a particular business to run branded paid search.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it make sense to run branded paid search? If you run branded search are you just taking credit for conversions that would have happened anyway? Is running just non-brand the way to go because it drives purely incremental revenue? Even if it kills your paid search ROI, these are valid questions to consider. It’s important to think about how paid search impacts a client’s business as a whole, not just boast about glitzy 50-to-1 ROI numbers from just running brand. These are the issues that we tried to consider when devising a test to determine whether or not it makes sense for a particular business to run branded paid search.</p>
<p>There are two main ways of looking at the value of branded paid search:</p>
<ol>
<li>It does not make sense to run branded search if you have strong organic rankings for your brand because your organic listings will pick up that traffic and conversion. Why pay for something that you can get for free?</li>
<li>People who search for a brand term are often in a research mindset rather than a purchasing mindset, and with paid search ads you can present these potential customers with a much more compelling offer and land them on the ideally optimized page to convert traffic. Your conversion rate and total site conversions will be higher if you run a well executed brand paid search campaign. Also, if you don’t bid on brand terms than competitors who bid on your brand terms are more likely to steal traffic and revenue from you.</li>
</ol>
<p>For the test we are trying to figure out how to maximize our paid search spend in terms of generating total conversions. We have seen that our non-brand search spend has a tremendous impact on the organic traffic and revenue of this particular client. We don’t care who gets credit for the conversion that comes through; we are only concerned about maximizing conversions as a whole. Therefore, our goals for the brand test are to:</p>
<ul>
<li>Understand whether we should be running branded paid search terms</li>
<li>Figure out how to truly maximize site bookings for a given budget</li>
<li>Better understand the relationship between paid search and natural traffic and conversions</li>
</ul>
<p>To hopefully accomplish these goals we are running a period of true non-brand search (with the true brand term set as a negative keyword) followed by a period of full branded paid search. We plan to keep spend levels perfectly constant between the two periods and monitor total conversions through Omniture. We are going to ignore Bluestreak paid search data entirely and look at combined organic and paid conversions. The period with higher conversions wins.</p>
<p>Of course, there are many variables that can throw off our results: holidays, conversion window, organic search trends, paid search competitors, etc. There is no way that we can run a perfect test. Our hope is that something will really jump out at us though and we can feel confident coming to some conclusion.</p>
<p>Right now, we are in the middle of our test. We are running just non-brand. In a few weeks we are going to run full force brand and compare results between the two periods. We are eager to see how the test turns out and get back to the client with our recommendation as to whether or not they should be running branded paid search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://therangeblog.com/ppc/does-it-make-sense-to-run-branded-paid-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$25 Off! If You Read This!</title>
		<link>http://therangeblog.com/within-range/25-off-if-you-read-this/</link>
		<comments>http://therangeblog.com/within-range/25-off-if-you-read-this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danielle Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research & Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within Range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blossom goodchild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comscore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic forecasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galactic federation of light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online influentials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarah holoubek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ufo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therangeblog.com/?p=184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By now we’ve all been battered and bruised by the economic prospects for Q4. At some point though, my internal filter shuts down, and every subsequent devastating factoid yelling at me from a webpage becomes a blur. To summarize, here are a few key phrases that come to mind when recalling the past few weeks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By now we’ve all been battered and bruised by the economic prospects for Q4. At some point though, my internal filter shuts down, and every subsequent devastating factoid yelling at me from a webpage becomes a blur. To summarize, here are a few key phrases that come to mind when recalling the past few weeks of alerts; down, bleak, worst, crisis, bailout, insert bank name here. You get the point. We all get the point. However, here in the online space, we can’t merely curl into a ball and resign to apocalyptic economic doom without a fight or…. at least a coupon, anyway. Think of the coupon as your bunker. The last refuge for you and the cockroaches.</p>
<p>Okay, that’s a little dramatic, but it’s rainy outside, and it’s put me in a theatrical mood.</p>
<p>On to the meaty stuff!</p>
<p>Recently, comScore released findings from their June 2008 study, “Reaching Shoppers in a Down Economy”.</p>
<p>Insert ray of light, hope or at least a weapon to help fight your way to as close to victory as you can come.</p>
<p>The bottom line for marketers is that people are shopping less frequently (down 68%) and purporting to use coupons more often (up 59%). It’s really not rocket science –Consumers still want stuff –they just need a way not to feel threatened by it. So what can brands do? Obviously this question depends on who your brand is and what you’re willing to communicate to customers. If you’re comfortable with the obvious discount offer, then offer it. Build search campaigns around appropriate terms, partner with reputable coupon sites or utilize a combination of the above. If you’re a brand that’s always been part of this mix, make sure your organic search is built to capture the growing demand and continue to unearth new trends in the recent resurgence. Even if you err on the side of luxury, take heart: there are ways to communicate extended value to your loyal base and think about your holiday product assortment. Maybe this year we push the $1,200 handbag versus the $3,500 and shoot for increased volume; hey—at least it’s an idea.</p>
<p>No matter what your economic bracket is, doubt and insecurity linger. Retailers need to find a way to reassure shopper that their purchases are sound and wait for tomorrow to come. Perhaps all that relationship building will pay dividends when the tides turn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://therangeblog.com/within-range/25-off-if-you-read-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
